Places Links:



Take This Warning,
you who would hurt
the creatures of wood,
meadow, and hearth.
Beware the Catwomen,
who follow Artemis.


The Spiraling Cycle
(My Spiritual Home page)
Higher Consciousness
(My Story;The Cat's Story)
(find the secret clicks and the deeper in you will go)
(the blog you are reading now)

Magic Carpet Links
in each Moon

Blog Moon
Places Moon
Social Change Moon
Book Moon

Back to the top of this page

Earth Holidays

"From conception the increase
From increase the swelling
From swelling the thought
From thought the remembrance
From remembrance the consciousness,
the desire..."
---- Maori Creation Chant

Winter Solstice
First Light
Spring Equinox
May Day
Summer Solstice
First Fruits
Autumn Equinox
All Hallows Eve

moon phases

Back to the top of this page

 Favorite Places  

Myth*ing Link

45 million voices Abortion stories

ABA News
Abolish Sport Hunting
Abolish Animal Terrorism
Abolitionist On-line
Abuse tracker
Action for Change networking site for change agents
"Afghanistan` Project"
Animal Liberation Front ALF
(May the Universe Keep Them Safe and Active for they are the finest of us all and they harm no living thing despite what the bosses tell you)
Animal Police
Animals and Politics
Animal in WI Recomended Site
Anti-Slavery International
More animal links on my website under Social Change Moon
American Thinker
American Center for Democracy Libel Tourism and first amendment rights
Art Links Place's Moon - 3rd col
Art that Saves Animals
Arts Wisconsin
Ashes & Snow use mouse on each picture
Art original

Banking on Heaven polygamy video
Beautiful Links
Bees do not Sting
Bees & Wannabes
Best Friends Sanctuary and Resources
Big Poon's Very Best Catnip
Bird Food

C-Span Video Library
CAIDS - Hunters for intelligent alternatives to Chronic Wasting Disease hysteria
Catch the Moon
Center for Feminist Art
The Center for Responsible Lending
Center for Gender Refugee Campaigns
Ceramic Sculpture
Birds View - Creamic Sculptures of Jacqeline Jrolf
"A Libra whose element is air. She makes birds and what is happening to the air (and herself) through birds"
Chicago Women's Liberation Union
Coalition for American Workers Save jobs for citizens. Prevent in and outsourcing jobs.
Compassion Over Killing
Conflict Resolution

Corporate Control of US Democracy
Cosmology 3D
Cows with Guns

Daily Coyote
  New Daily Coyote
New Daily Coyote
Daily Puma
Dhimmi Watch
Donna Hughes

Earth Best Defense
Earth Justice Because the earth needs a good lawyer: recommended site
Eat Well at Veg Web
Equal Pay Act Check out how this site has changed under the BO adm. They have a link to go to the old site. Go to the old site to see then and now – they will keep the old site up for a few more months
Equal Rights Amendment
Equal Pay -after 45 years
ET Vegan
Earth & Sky
Eastern Shore Sanctuary
Enough genocide discussions and reports
Equality 4Women Reference papers for organizing
Exploitation and trafficking in Women (Hughes)
Easy to understand/enviromental Issues

Back to the top of this page

Fact Check
Female Genital Mutilation
Family Court Issues for Feminists – Custody - Abuse
Feminist Literature 1405-2011
Feminist News
Feminist News Service
Feminist Peace Network
Feminist Research
Fight for Free Public Resources
Fixed Star consultations
Flying Elephants Foundation
For Any Soldier
Food Fight
Food Politics
Free the Slaves click on the Blog link
Free US Now Radio
Foster Parrots LTD


Garden Habitat
Galapagos Preservation Society
removal of feral (recommended site)

Genderberg Resource for sexual exploitation activists and researchers
Global aid from US
Great Cards
Green Earth Travelvegetarian travel tours
Greener Choices
Green Energy Policy
Guide to Vegetarian Restaurants & Health Food Stores in USA

Handmade Nation
Documentary for Handmade Nation
Hedge Craft Rae Beth
Hillary's Voice NP Blogroll

Human Trafficking Middle East
    State Dept's Office

Illusion Science
Immigration studies
Inclusive Security
Initiative to Educate Afghan Women
Institute for Inclusive Security
Women's Liberation Globally
Intern'l Museum of Womenwomen's art
Iran and Kurd Women's Rights
Isabella's Closet

Jane Goodall Institute
Jihad Watch
Judy Chicago
Judy Chicago Gallery Art
Jung Personality Test


Law Library free
Law News
Lobby for Animals
Latina Women Human Rights

Mad Cowboy
M.A.R.V. (Milwaukee Area Resources for Vegetarians)
Medicinal Herbs
Military Sexual Assault Response and Prevention
Women Organizing Against Military Sexual Assault
Service Women's Support Network
Military Rape research
Monarch Watch - Grow Milkweed!
Moo Shoes
Moonlady Pages
Muslims Against Sharia

Natural Resources Defense Council
NOW News
The National Women's Law Center
Numbers USA Bi partisan immigration reduction organization

On the Question of Animal Rights
Open Secrets
   Open Rescue
Open Rescue

Opinions You Should Have
Operation Bagdad Pups

Visit Green's profile on Pinterest.
Popvox - TO Follow a Bill in Congress
Prostitution Research & Ed
Prostitution Rescue
PC Organization
Primate Freedom (RECOMMENDED SITE)
PISSD - Personal Injury, Social Security Disability injured and disabled persons mistreated by government and insurance companies
Peaceful Choices
Place Moon alternative energy
Polaris Project anti slavery/trafficking


Refugee Resettlement Watch recommended site
Residential Property Issues
Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.)

Sari Art
Sair Art

Sea Shepherd
Skin Deep check your cosmetics to see how toxic they are to your health
Smoothies Recipes for Smoothies
Spirit of America 100% of your tax-deductible donation goes to these projects initiated by Americans serving abroad
Stateline (News from the States)
Stop Honor Killings
Stray Pet Advocacy

Sexual Offenders
National Sex Offender Registry
Sleepwalking to extinction
Survivors of Clergy Abuse
Wisconsin Sex Offender Register

Track Fed Legislation
Travel Guide (Vegetarian)
Treating Glaucoma
Top Ten Links
Trafficking in Women-International

Understanding Taqiyya
US Constitution

Vegetarian Restaurants in Wisconsin
Vegan Essentials
Vegetarian Meals Delivered
Vegetarian Food Facts
Vegetarian Resource Group
void of course
Vegan Nutrition Podcasts
Sacred hallows-not horror violence

Wiscat, Wisconsin’s union catalog
Enter the term, “women,” 444 entries; books, periodicals, oral history interviews, and manuscript collections.

WI Best Friends (recommended animal rescue site)
Wisconsin Woodland Owners and Lovers
Wild WI
Wild Ones
Wolf Pack Tarot
WOMEN AGAINST FUNDAMENTALISM IN IRAN Support Women Slaves Struggling to Organize in Iran - NOW! Follow the link above to find the website of women organizing behind burqas to bring freedom to Iran
Women in the Muslim World
Women Living Under Muslim Laws
Intern'l Women's Day March 8
Women's Foreign Policy Group
Women's Freedom Forum
Women's History Archives
Women's History Month In 1987, Congress declared March to be Women's History Month
Women's Medical Fund, Inc Assisting Wisconsin women who want but cannot afford abortion - please help
Women’s Studies Librarian’s Office Home of Feminist Collections Journal
Women's Suffrage Day August 26th
Women United
Woodstock Farm Sanctuary
WI Coalition Against Domestic Violence I rarely agree with these liberals who take a great deal of the DV funding
WI Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency
WI Newspapers Forum & Blogs
WI Statutes
WI Vegetarian
WI Veterans Museum
WI Watch Reporters covering the underbelly of policy shaping WI while you are unconscious




Despite the challenges, we were seeing free and democratic Iraq, we were living the hard laboring moment we believe that every one of us has duty towards our beloved country. By our hands, work, thoughts, sacrifice we will build up the new Iraq.

Back to the top of this page

Judges can sit on their friends cases in Wisconsin, the state where we don't bother to pretend anymore

n battle over judicial recusal, First Amendment trumped due process rights
By Alex De Grand, Legal Writer, State Bar of Wisconsin

Nov. 4, 2009 – The First Amendment outweighed due process arguments when the Wisconsin Supreme Court declared on Oct. 28 that judges are not required to recuse themselves from cases featuring campaign contributors or parties who made independent expenditures.

“My major concern is the First Amendment,” said Justice Patience Roggensack, one of the four justices to vote in favor of the petitions amending the state Code of Judicial Conduct to exclude these campaign activities as the basis for disqualification on the premise that they are protected speech. Justices David Prosser, Annette Ziegler, and Michael Gableman joined Roggensack in approving the petitions

“I know we are being asked to focus on recusal, not the right to vote,” Roggensack said. “But I do not think you can help but impact the First Amendment when you set the kind of limits that require recusal.”

The due process argument

Justices adopted petition 08-25 offered by the Wisconsin Realtors Association and petition 09-10 from the Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce trade group following this summer’s decision on judicial recusal in Caperton v. Massey, 129 S. Ct. 2252.

In Caperton, the nation’s high court found a due process violation occurred when the chief executive officer of a corporation contributed $3 million to the election campaign of the judge before whom it was likely the corporation would be seeking appellate relief.

Writing in support of its petition, the League of Women Voters argued for disqualification of a judge in receipt of campaign contributions totaling $1,000 or more within the preceding two years because “[p]eople who go before a judge should be able to trust that the judge is a fair and impartial decision maker.”

Addressing the justices in support of recusal rules tied to campaign spending, the Brennan Center for Justice argued that a recusal rule does not have to intrude upon protected speech, drawing a distinction between the activities of a candidate standing for office and a judge sitting on a case. “The First Amendment does not entitle any party to choose what judge will hear the case,” the center commented in a letter to the court.

But the Realtors argued that the trend in election law is toward less regulation of speech, beginning with the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Republican Party of Minnesota v. White, 536 U.S. 765 (2002). In White, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the First Amendment forbids a canon of judicial conduct preventing judicial candidates from announcing their views on disputed legal or political issues.

Since White, the Realtors noted, a series of cases have steadily expanded the scope of permissible conduct in judicial campaigns, including Seifert v. Alexander, 597 F. Supp. 2d 860, which invalidated provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct curtailing a judge’s partisan activities.

A majority of the justices opted to follow this trend. Explaining his vote in favor of rules favoring campaign donations, Gableman said, “If there is something unacceptable about a political candidate, a candidate for any public office including a judge or justice, the power in this country resides with the people [to remove them].”

Mere clarification?

Roggensack remarked that the new recusal rules only clarify existing law, citing the court’s holding in Donohoo v. Action Wisconsin Inc., 2008 WI 110. In Donohoo, the court rejected a motion to recuse Justice Louis Butler on account of a campaign contribution.

In Donohoo, the court remarked, “There is no case in Wisconsin or elsewhere that requires recusal of a judge based solely on a contribution to a judicial campaign.”

“I think what has been put forth by the two petitions we should grant, in my view doesn’t change the interpretation of the law,” Roggensack said. “But what it does is kind of give the courts the blessing of my interpretation of the law.”

But Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, who voted in opposition to the rules sanctioning campaign spending, wondered whether the current law should be preserved without further study.

“It gave me pause when Justice Bablitch said if you pass the Realtors and WMC [petitions], you just memorialize the status quo into law,” Bradley said, referring to testimony from retired state supreme court Justice William Bablitch in which he said that the business groups “want to keep a system that has worked for them but that has not worked for the average litigant; that’s the worst thing you could do.” Bablitch had sponsored his own petition for recusal on account of campaign contributions.

No other factors considered

Chief Justice Abrahamson sought to add language that would spell out circumstances that – as in Caperton – campaign activity did disqualify a judge. But Roggensack argued that the court’s listing of factors would inadvertently leave others out.

Pressing her point, Abrahamson argued that Wisconsin judges need better direction than a mere mention of what is not a basis for recusal, “What does this standard tell me?” Abrahamson said. “It tells me that it’s not based solely [on campaign spending]. What else am I going to look at?”

“You can’t answer that for me,” Abrahamson said. “If you want certainty, this doesn’t give it. I think this is the present law and people seem dissatisfied with it so we should be doing something that might help them.”

“I think passing this with the discussion we’ve had … sends a message that it is not dishonorable to contribute an amount to a campaign,” Roggensack said. “I think what’s in the media constantly is, ‘Oh, judges are being bought. People are contributing $10,000 to a judge [running] in Wisconsin.’ I don’t know how many $10,000 contributions you got; I got one and it was from a family member, so it’s not something I am really troubled with.”

The court ultimately voted to adopt the Realtors and WMC petitions without any amendments.

Not over?

“This is a developing area of the law,” Roggensack said, mentioning an expected decision from the U.S. Supreme Court in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission addressing free speech issues raised by campaign finance laws.

Roggensack said that the court would likely study recusal as the law evolves on the issue. She added that Wisconsin, with its distinctive rules permitting substitution of judges at the trial court level, “is probably at the forefront” of the national debate.

“I think Wisconsin has always been sensitive to the appearance of justice and letting the litigants have their day in court,” she said.

UPDATE: Wisconsin Supreme Court withdraws earlier vote on recusal rules
By Alex De Grand, Legal Writer, State Bar of Wisconsin

Dec. 7, 2009 – The Wisconsin Supreme Court today withdrew its vote in October to adopt – as written – a petition amending the Code of Judicial Conduct so that the receipt of a campaign contribution or an independent expenditure by a party to the proceedings does not require a judge’s recusal.

By the same action, the justices withdrew its earlier vote for a petition amending the Code of Judicial Conduct so that a judge is not required to recuse him or herself where a party to the proceedings sponsored an independent expenditure or issue advocacy during the judicial campaign.

The petition regarding campaign contributions was authored by the Wisconsin Realtors Association; the Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce offered the petition concerning independent expenditures. The court had split 4-3 in its approval of the measures.

Justices determined that they could no longer support their earlier action during an administrative conference held to consider a Nov. 24 letter from the petitioners seeking amended language to resolve the two petitions’ inconsistent terminology for campaign participants before a court. Specifically, the court found it needed to rewrite portions of the petitions it had voted to accept "verbatim."

Initially, Justice David Prosser suggested that this change amounted to no more than “fine tuning” the language. But Prosser indicated other changes might be necessary so that the rules apply beyond just incumbent judges. He also said the rules could better distinguish between the receipt of a lawful contribution and its solicitation.

Given the significance of the changes, Prosser informed the court he had to withdraw the vote he cast with Justices Patience Roggensack, Annette Ziegler and Michael Gableman in favor of the two petitions. Without Prosser's vote, the petitions no longer commanded support from a majority of justices.

Prosser said he did not want the court to further delay addressing the issue of recusal and he said that he still supported the essence of the two petitions. Chief Justice Abrahamson said that the court will revisit the matter next month.

The justices’ actions follow this summer’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling on judicial recusal in Caperton v. Massey, 129 S.Ct. 2252. In Caperton, the nation’s high court found a due process violation occurred when the chief executive officer of a corporation contributed $3 million to the election campaign of the judge before whom it was likely the corporation would be seeking appellate relief.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeah, so many "special" people, heh, here in Wisconsin.


10:46 PM, November 16, 2009  

Post a Comment