Places Links:

  MY ENTIRE WEBSITE
  EARTH HOLIDAYS
  FAVORITE PLACES
  BOTTOM OF PAGE

MY ENTIRE WEBSITE:

Take This Warning,
you who would hurt
the creatures of wood,
meadow, and hearth.
Beware the Catwomen,
who follow Artemis.

PUMA PAC

The Spiraling Cycle
(My Spiritual Home page)
Higher Consciousness
(My Story;The Cat's Story)
Subconscious
(find the secret clicks and the deeper in you will go)
Consciousness
(the blog you are reading now)

Magic Carpet Links
in each Moon

Blog Moon
Places Moon
Social Change Moon
Book Moon

Back to the top of this page


Earth Holidays

"From conception the increase
From increase the swelling
From swelling the thought
From thought the remembrance
From remembrance the consciousness,
the desire..."
---- Maori Creation Chant

Winter Solstice
First Light
Spring Equinox
May Day
Summer Solstice
First Fruits
Autumn Equinox
All Hallows Eve



moon phases
 

Back to the top of this page


 Favorite Places  

MOST FAVORITE PLACE
Myth*ing Link

-0...9-
45 million voices Abortion stories

-A-
ABA News
Abolish Sport Hunting
Abolish Animal Terrorism
Abolitionist On-line
Abuse tracker
Action for Change networking site for change agents
"Afghanistan` Project"
Animal Liberation Front ALF
(May the Universe Keep Them Safe and Active for they are the finest of us all and they harm no living thing despite what the bosses tell you)
Animal Police
Animals and Politics
Animal in WI Recomended Site
Anti-Slavery International
More animal links on my website under Social Change Moon
American Thinker
American Center for Democracy Libel Tourism and first amendment rights
Archetypes
Art Links Place's Moon - 3rd col
Art that Saves Animals
Arts Wisconsin
Ashes & Snow use mouse on each picture
ASPCA
Art original

-B-
Banking on Heaven polygamy video
Beautiful Links
Bees do not Sting
Bees & Wannabes
Best Friends Sanctuary and Resources
Big Poon's Very Best Catnip
BILL OF RIGHTS
Bird Food

-C-
C-Span Video Library
CAIDS - Hunters for intelligent alternatives to Chronic Wasting Disease hysteria
Catch the Moon
Center for Feminist Art
The Center for Responsible Lending
Center for Gender Refugee Campaigns
Ceramic Sculpture
Birds View - Creamic Sculptures of Jacqeline Jrolf
"A Libra whose element is air. She makes birds and what is happening to the air (and herself) through birds"
Chicago Women's Liberation Union
Coalition for American Workers Save jobs for citizens. Prevent in and outsourcing jobs.
Compassion Over Killing
Conflict Resolution

Corporate Control of US Democracy
Cosmology 3D
Cows with Guns

-D-
Daily Coyote
  New Daily Coyote
New Daily Coyote
Daily Puma
Dhimmi Watch
Donna Hughes

-E-
Earth Best Defense
Earth Justice Because the earth needs a good lawyer: recommended site
Eat Well at Veg Web
Equal Pay Act Check out how this site has changed under the BO adm. They have a link to go to the old site. Go to the old site to see then and now – they will keep the old site up for a few more months
Equal Rights Amendment
Equal Pay -after 45 years
ET Vegan
Earth & Sky
Eastern Shore Sanctuary
Enough genocide discussions and reports
Equality 4Women Reference papers for organizing
Exploitation and trafficking in Women (Hughes)
Easy to understand/enviromental Issues

Back to the top of this page

-F-
Fact Check
Female Genital Mutilation
Family Court Issues for Feminists – Custody - Abuse
Feminist Literature 1405-2011
Feminist News
Feminist News Service
Feminist Peace Network
Feminist Research
Fight for Free Public Resources
Fixed Star consultations
Florizel
Flying Elephants Foundation
For Any Soldier
Food Fight
Food Politics
Free the Slaves click on the Blog link
Free US Now Radio
Foster Parrots LTD

 

-G-
Garden Habitat
Galapagos Preservation Society
removal of feral (recommended site)

Genderberg Resource for sexual exploitation activists and researchers
Global aid from US
Great Cards
Green Earth Travelvegetarian travel tours
Greener Choices
Green Energy Policy
Guide to Vegetarian Restaurants & Health Food Stores in USA

-H-
Handmade Nation
Documentary for Handmade Nation
Hedge Craft Rae Beth
Herbarium
Hillary's Voice NP Blogroll


Human Trafficking Middle East
    State Dept's Office

-I-
I AM NOT SORRY NEWS
Illusion Science
Immigration studies
Inclusive Security
Initiative to Educate Afghan Women
Institute for Inclusive Security
Women's Liberation Globally
Intern'l Museum of Womenwomen's art
Iran and Kurd Women's Rights
Isabella's Closet

-J-
JaneDoeThreads
Jane Goodall Institute
Jihad Watch
Judy Chicago
Judy Chicago Gallery Art
Jung Personality Test

-K-
KUAN YIN

-L-
Law
Law Library free
Law News
Lobby for Animals
Latina Women Human Rights

-M-
Mad Cowboy
M.A.R.V. (Milwaukee Area Resources for Vegetarians)
Medicinal Herbs
Menstruation
Military Sexual Assault Response and Prevention
Women Organizing Against Military Sexual Assault
Service Women's Support Network
Military Rape research
Monarch Watch - Grow Milkweed!
Moo Shoes
Moonlady Pages
Muslims Against Sharia

-N-
Natural Resources Defense Council
NOW News
The National Women's Law Center
Numbers USA Bi partisan immigration reduction organization

-O-
On the Question of Animal Rights
Open Secrets
   Open Rescue
Open Rescue

Opinions You Should Have
ohmidog!
Operation Bagdad Pups

-P-
Visit Green's profile on Pinterest.
Popvox - TO Follow a Bill in Congress
Prostitution Research & Ed
Prostitution Rescue
PC Organization
Primate Freedom (RECOMMENDED SITE)
PaganNews.com
PISSD - Personal Injury, Social Security Disability injured and disabled persons mistreated by government and insurance companies
Peaceful Choices
Place Moon alternative energy
Polaris Project anti slavery/trafficking

-Q-

-R-
REAL POLITICS
Refugee Resettlement Watch recommended site
Residential Property Issues
Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.)
ROCK ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK

-S-
Sari Art
Sair Art

Sea Shepherd
Skin Deep check your cosmetics to see how toxic they are to your health
Smoothies Recipes for Smoothies
Spirit of America 100% of your tax-deductible donation goes to these projects initiated by Americans serving abroad
Stateline (News from the States)
Stop Honor Killings
Stray Pet Advocacy

Sexual Offenders
National Sex Offender Registry
Sleepwalking to extinction
Survivors of Clergy Abuse
Wisconsin Sex Offender Register

-T-
Track Fed Legislation
Treehugger
Travel Guide (Vegetarian)
Treating Glaucoma
Top Ten Links
Treasures
Trafficking in Women-International
THE CITY EDITION
   RECOMMENDED SITE

-U-
Understanding Taqiyya
US Constitution

-V-
Vegetarian Restaurants in Wisconsin
Vegan Essentials
Vegetarian Meals Delivered
Vegetarian Food Facts
Vegetarian Resource Group
void of course
Vegan Nutrition Podcasts
VINTAGE HALLOWEEN
Sacred hallows-not horror violence

-W-
Wiscat, Wisconsin’s union catalog
Enter the term, “women,” 444 entries; books, periodicals, oral history interviews, and manuscript collections.

WI Best Friends (recommended animal rescue site)
Wisconsin Woodland Owners and Lovers
Wild WI
Wild Ones
Wolf Pack Tarot
WOMEN AGAINST FUNDAMENTALISM IN IRAN Support Women Slaves Struggling to Organize in Iran - NOW! Follow the link above to find the website of women organizing behind burqas to bring freedom to Iran
WOMEN AGAINST SHARIA
Women in the Muslim World
Women Living Under Muslim Laws
Intern'l Women's Day March 8
Women's Foreign Policy Group
Women's Freedom Forum
Women's History Archives
Women's History Month In 1987, Congress declared March to be Women's History Month
Women's Medical Fund, Inc Assisting Wisconsin women who want but cannot afford abortion - please help
Women’s Studies Librarian’s Office Home of Feminist Collections Journal
Women's Suffrage Day August 26th
Women United
Woodstock Farm Sanctuary
WI Coalition Against Domestic Violence I rarely agree with these liberals who take a great deal of the DV funding
WI Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency
WI Newspapers Forum & Blogs
WisconSUN
WI Statutes
WI Vegetarian
WI Veterans Museum
WI Watch Reporters covering the underbelly of policy shaping WI while you are unconscious

-X-

-Y-

-Z-


Despite the challenges, we were seeing free and democratic Iraq, we were living the hard laboring moment we believe that every one of us has duty towards our beloved country. By our hands, work, thoughts, sacrifice we will build up the new Iraq.


Back to the top of this page





Does Sharia Libel Law Now Apply in the U.S.?

When truth = slander

A narrow, technical New York Appeals Court decision rendered last month essentially means that American writers and publishers can be held subject to Islamic law. Alyssa Lappen explains how. by Alyssa A. Lappen

Unless the U.S. Congress and New York legislatures act immediately to stop them, foreign terror financiers and libel tourists now can essentially impose sharia (Islamic) law on American writers and publishers.
Intended or not, a narrow, technical New York Appeals Court decision on Thursday Dec. 20, 2007 produces that net effect.

The ruling concerns jurisdiction in Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld’s suit against Saudi billionaire Khalid bin Mahfouz, seeking a federal declaratory judgment against him to render unenforceable in the U.S. a U.K. High Court default “libel” decision. By implication, the New York Appeals Court ruling harms all publishers and writers in New York, the world’s publishing capital.

Ehrenfeld’s case stems from her 2003 book, Funding Evil: How Terrorism is Financed—and How to Stop It, where American Center for Democracy Director reports Mahfouz’ well-documented terror funding. (Full disclosure: Since September 2005, I’ve been an ACD Senior Fellow.)

As always after such terror financing reports, Mahfouz sued Ehrenfeld for libel in Britain. His attorneys informed U.K. High Court Justice David Eady that former CIA director R. James Woolsey wrote her book’s foreword. “Say no more,” Eady replied. “I award you a judgment by default, and if you want, an injunction, too.”

Eady then ordered Ehrenfeld to apologize, retract, pay Mahfouz $225,913.37 in damages and destroy remaining copies of her book. Instead, she ignored the British default judgment and false libel claim—never tried on its meritsand asked the Southern District Court of New York to rule the U.K. judgment unenforceable here.

In the U.S., the Supreme Court’s seminal 1964 New York Times v. Sullivan decision defined libel or slander by a journalist as stating or writing falsehoods or misrepresentations that damage someone’s reputation—and in cases of public figures, doing so with malice.

Under sharia, by contrast, libel constitutes any oral or written remark offensive to a complainant, regardless of its accuracy or intent. Slander “means to mention anything concerning a person that he would dislike, whether about his body, religion, everyday life, self, disposition, property, son, father, wife, servant, turban, garment, gait, movements, smiling, dissoluteness, frowning, cheerfulness, or anything else connected with him,” according to Ahmad Ibn Lulu Ibn Al-Naqib (d. 1368).

Repeat: Sharia regards even the truth as slander if its subject dislikes the facts. Now applied through foreign courts, sharia law interpretations of libel have demonstrably undermined U.S. press viability already.

Though Mahfouz never proved merits in any libel case, he has threatened or sued more than 35 journalists and publishers (including many in the U.S.) through Britain’s High Court, and exacted fines, apologies and retractions from all but Ehrenfeld. Last Thursday, New York’s Appeals Court substantially (if not intentionally) allowed the application of sharia rules here.

New York State recently held that it can collect sales taxes from “commercial” enterprises with as little physical presence as a single link on any New York-based website. While temporarily reversed on November 15, the state’s controversial opinion will be enforced after the 2007 Christmas season...............................................read more here


2 Comments:

Blogger Kevin T. Keith said...

Well, this is certainly a terrible outcome, and there are severe problems with the expansive reach of UK libel judgments, but this case is really not that outrageous from a legal standpoint, and it has absolutely nothing to do with sharia, in the UK or the US.

The background is this: British libel trials are famously favorable to the plaintiffs; there is no free speech protection as in the US, so a defendant has to be prepared to prove that every single word they wrote is true or they will be found liable for damages. Plaintiffs often prefer to sue in UK courts if they can for this reason. Worse, the British courts have begun finding that almost anything that is even potentially available in the UK - for instance, through Amazon.com - has been "published" there, so they are now accepting suits against foreign authors who are not carried by a British publisher or even have books for sale in the UK. This is what Mahfouz has been taking advantage of, to bring harassment suits against anyone who criticizes him. And clearly, this is a problem.

But the libel suits are conducted entirely under traditional British law. I have no idea where the quote about libel under sharia comes in; it has absolutely no bearing on this case or any other British libel case. The definition of libel under British law is roughly the same as anywhere else: to falsely accuse someone of something reprehensible. The only difference is that there is an absolute burden of proof on the person saying it. Sharia is not part of a libel trial in the UK, no matter who the plaintiff is, and it was not part of the judge's decision in this case.

In Ehrenfeld's case, she lost her libel suit because she made no effort at all to defend against it. Not only is the quote about sharia irrelevant, but the strange anecdote about the James Woolsey forward is equally irrelevant. Whatever that exchange may mean, it has nothing to do with why she lost her case.

As you yourself note, Ehrenfeld was subject to a default judgment. That is, she automatically lost her case in the British court because she didn't bother to defend it, or even show up for the trial. Default judgments are standard in every legal system. As the New York court decision you linked clearly states, she and her US lawyers were duly informed of the suit pending in the UK, and she made a decision, which she herself admits, not to hire a British lawyer or attempt to try the suit both because of the difficulty of winning and because of her ideological belief that the UK libel standard was wrong and she should not have had to defend herself there. Given her refusal to enter any defense, there was no possible outcome other than that the court would find against her. It would be the same in a US court, or anywhere else. You are right that the libel case was never tried on its merits, but that was Ehrenfeld's decision. The plaintiffs were (apparently) prepared to put forth their side of the case; she refused to put forth her own side, and the case was not tried because she refused to let it come to trial.

The New York court's decision was not very surprising either. She was asking the court to vacate a valid ruling in a British court that she herself had refused to acknowledge. In other words, she was essentially asking the US court to declare that US citizens do not have to accept decisions from lawsuits in foreign countries if they personally don't choose to do so. Of course the court was not going to do that. The technical grounds for the ruling - that she cannot countersue someone in a US court with whom she had no contact in the US - is somewhat ironic, given the British court's decision that she could be sued in the UK even though her book is not published there - but the basic idea - that she doesn't have to accept a foreign court's judgments if she doesn't like them - is hardly controversial.

The problem is the British judiciary's belief that, essentially, anyone can sue anyone for libel in the UK, regardless of whether anything any of them have done actually took place in the UK. That trend is causing a real problem in publishing. But it has nothing whatsoever to do with sharia or the CIA, and Ehrenfeld's legal problems, though galling, are not some sort of travesty. They are in part the result of her own refusal to believe the law applies to her.

3:56 PM, January 02, 2008  
Blogger greenconsciousness said...

Kevin
I just copied this Sharia post here. Your extremely perceptive rebuttal comments need to be copied and placed under the original article which I linked to where i say, "read more here".

I wish you had said more about why it is a bad decision. Perhaps you will under the original post. Your comments are very helpful. Please copy them over there.

Then After you do that, I hope you go over to "Cheslers Chronicles". She is on the same site. That is a blog where we often post about the threat of Sharia law.

Perhaps you do not know that Canada is very close to allowing Sharia to govern their family court for Muslims. THERE IS AN ENTIRE CANADIAN SITE DEVOTED TO THE PROBLEM - STOP SHARIA LAW oops sometimes my caps go on by accident. Anyways - thanks for the info. I admire the clarity of your writing. GC

4:38 PM, January 02, 2008  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link